In the style of the main game, you take control of five skillful assassins, including Aiko, to sneak in the shadows between dozens of enemies.
Together with her deadly companions she sets out to hunt down the ghosts of her past… She is a master of camouflage and distracts enemies disguised as a Geisha.Īlthough Aiko was certain that she left her old life behind her, Aiko’s former sensei, the cunning spymaster Lady Chiyo, reappears from the shadows to challenge her. The expansion focuses on one of the main game’s protagonists: the kunoichi adept Aiko. Set in Japan around the early Edo period, Aiko’s Choice is a stealth strategy game that takes place within the story of Shadow Tactics: Blades of the Shogun.
another kind of freedom.Return to the beautiful world of Edo Japan If I don't buy, but get for free, it is less of an issue for me. If they last beyond that, added extra bonus.įor me, GOG is about owning the game I buy. They are a bit like a free loan from a library. If I lose access to them, no money lost, no stolen purchase. They are just something I get to play with if I want. So in a sense, I don't really feel I own the freebies from other stores. If I cared too much about that, then I would just buy the game at GOG.
#Shadow tactics free gog install#
Yes, I may have to install the clients from other stores and I am not really happy about that.īut with a game I got for free, I don't need to consider whether that acquisition is future proof or not, so DRM is not a major factor in their case, in that regard. I think what I have already will see me out to the end of my days anyway.Īt the end of the day, it all comes down to how you rationalize things. That won't make me rush out and buy stuff from the other stores, but I will have a good free library collection to play beyond GOG. As much as I hate the possibility, one needs to consider that possible reality. but they would in any case if I bought at GOG.Īnd never forget, that GOG might die one day.
They might see it as beneficial, but I can assure you they will never get money from me because of it. It might boost their numbers, but that is all. In any case, every freebie I get from Epic or Steam, is one sale loss to them. Perhaps we will get GOG Connect working with Epic at some point, who knows. And with Steam, you may even benefit with GOG Connect one day. When you grab a game from Epic or Steam etc, that GOG also sell, you are still dealing with the same Devs, with the only difference being DRM. especially good where actual Demos don't exist. They allow me to check out games properly, that I may then decide to buy on GOG, at the right price, and especially for added content (DLCs etc). But in a very real way, those freebies are like a Demo on steroids. I have plenty of freebies from Epic, but not installed any of them yet. While I definitely prefer GOG over the other stores, and certainly don't like DRM, if those other stores are going to give away freebies, why not grab them. It would only stifle the correct use of downvotes, but would do nothing to deter those who abuse the system. now that I think about it, this measure wouldn't really solve a problem while adding a new one. Do you think Mr.Shitface would be downvoting you directly instead of keeping their distance while resorting to all these alts? (I'm not saying those are the only ones being downvoted by abuse now, mind you)īesides, what would you do if you knew that AltAccount1, AltAccount2 and AltAccount3 are the ones abusing the downvote button? Suppose the person who decided that you deserved negative rep is called "Mr.Shitface". The way things are now, even if the same people are downvoted, their "enemy" has no face. Imagine that person going after posts from you only to downvote them back, regardless of their content, just as a form of "retribution" (actually petty revenge). Imagine if you couldn't simply downvote someone because that person throws a shitstorm every time someone downvotes them. Basically, because it would be fuel for A LOT of drama from people so inclined. GameRager: What would be the problem of knowing who rated what? It would keep some more "honest", I would think, and other forums use that same feature to good effect.
0 kommentar(er)
